Y R all the GTO vs SS Threads Locked ?
#526
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-19-05
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#527
Banned
Join Date: 10-21-06
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
have you ever seen a gto commercial or GTO advertisements probably not pontiac didnt market the car , but people who have followed pontiac sure knew about it
Last edited by Red2.4SS/SC; 08-30-2007 at 11:11 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#528
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-21-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seriously cannot believe you guys are arguing that Pontiac had no intention of making money off of the GTO. I'm pretty sure you lost almost all credibility in my book for that one.
#529
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-19-05
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pontiac has plenty of other cars that can make them the money they need to keep producing , i sure do see alot of grand prixs and grand ams same with G5's and G6's trust me pontiac sells enough they just wanted to give something back to real enthusiasts
have you ever seen a gto commercial or GTO advertisements probably not pontiac didnt market the car , but people who have followed pontiac sure knew about it
have you ever seen a gto commercial or GTO advertisements probably not pontiac didnt market the car , but people who have followed pontiac sure knew about it
#530
Banned
Join Date: 10-21-06
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what im saying is pontiac didnt release the GTO to save the company
Last edited by Red2.4SS/SC; 08-30-2007 at 12:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#531
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-19-05
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im sure pontiac WANTED to make money but so did microsoft on the 360 its the same thing , but is a company going to rely ALL their trust in the 360 NO , thats why they have windows and other **** , same with pontiac , i mean sure they thought it was gonna make some money , but if it didnt they knew they could make money on other cars to even out
what im saying is pontiac didnt release the GTO to save the company
what im saying is pontiac didnt release the GTO to save the company
http://www.businessweek.com/technolo...122_410710.htm
Microsoft sells it at a loss because it makes it back + thru sales of accesories, licensing fees, live, etc.
**** wirelss controllers are 40, wireless adapter is 100, rechargable batteries, Points, etc. The money is in the accessories...without a xbox u cant sell accessories. Sell an xbox at a loss, mark up accessories...profit. Also costs come down as production continues. Many Car OEMs negotiate price cuts yearly in their supplier contracts. As a result cost to produce goes down as well.
Im not going to teach you economics. They have a plan on controlled losses offset by accessory sales.
Your method of making something when u cant make a profit even when u want to is ridiculous. Without a profit plan it aint getting greenlighted. And i highly doubt gm was planning on making extra profit thru keychain, mugs, mousepads, and pens with GTO stamped on em....
Gm is a company already struggling to make a profit. They are not gonna cut into POSSIBLE profits with a car they probably wont make money on designed for a niche market with statistically higher warranty costs due to "vehicle abuse"
#532
Banned
Join Date: 10-21-06
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL u really need to know what ur talking about before u post
http://www.businessweek.com/technolo...122_410710.htm
Microsoft sells it at a loss because it makes it back + thru sales of accesories, licensing fees, live, etc.
**** wirelss controllers are 40, wireless adapter is 100, rechargable batteries, Points, etc. The money is in the accessories...without a xbox u cant sell accessories. Sell an xbox at a loss, mark up accessories...profit. Also costs come down as production continues. Many Car OEMs negotiate price cuts yearly in their supplier contracts. As a result cost to produce goes down as well.
Im not going to teach you economics. They have a plan on controlled losses offset by accessory sales.
Your method of making something when u cant make a profit even when u want to is ridiculous. Without a profit plan it aint getting greenlighted. And i highly doubt gm was planning on making extra profit thru keychain, mugs, mousepads, and pens with GTO stamped on em....
http://www.businessweek.com/technolo...122_410710.htm
Microsoft sells it at a loss because it makes it back + thru sales of accesories, licensing fees, live, etc.
**** wirelss controllers are 40, wireless adapter is 100, rechargable batteries, Points, etc. The money is in the accessories...without a xbox u cant sell accessories. Sell an xbox at a loss, mark up accessories...profit. Also costs come down as production continues. Many Car OEMs negotiate price cuts yearly in their supplier contracts. As a result cost to produce goes down as well.
Im not going to teach you economics. They have a plan on controlled losses offset by accessory sales.
Your method of making something when u cant make a profit even when u want to is ridiculous. Without a profit plan it aint getting greenlighted. And i highly doubt gm was planning on making extra profit thru keychain, mugs, mousepads, and pens with GTO stamped on em....
MICROSOFT JUST SPENT 600 MILLION DOLLARS ON WARRANTY WORK ALONE
trust me ive taken economics , ill turn a penny to a twenty dont worry about me
#533
Chevy looses money on every base Cobalt sold, Pontiac looses money on every base model Solstice. It's not the loss on those vehicles they worry about, those get the customer in the door to buy other more profitable vehicles. Same type of advertising incentive as the "Free Gallon of Milk with a $20 purchase" that the grocery stores do.
Anyone remember the Buick Reatta? GM lost $23k for each vehicle sold. No ****.
Anyone remember the Buick Reatta? GM lost $23k for each vehicle sold. No ****.
#534
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-19-05
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually..it is allotted at 1.1billion
It is an unexpected cost...They budgeted a warranty amount and it overshot its boundary. They didnt know it was coming when they released it.
They didnt know it was going to fail at the time..if they did they would fixed it. If GM knew the gto was gonna fail...they wouldnt have released it. They didnt know consumers wouldnt be excited about the gto when they released it.
Funny still since they will still turn 4.5 billion in profit on 360 this yr...read the article.
You fail economics...and researching...and general arguements
#535
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-21-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im sure pontiac WANTED to make money but so did microsoft on the 360 its the same thing , but is a company going to rely ALL their trust in the 360 NO , thats why they have windows and other **** , same with pontiac , i mean sure they thought it was gonna make some money , but if it didnt they knew they could make money on other cars to even out
what im saying is pontiac didnt release the GTO to save the company
what im saying is pontiac didnt release the GTO to save the company
Microsoft makes their money on accessories, games, and subscriptions (Xbox Live). It was the same way with the original Xbox. Eventually, they actually started making profit on the hardware itself. But they view the Xbox business as a long term investment. They know they're going to make money on it. They're not just selling Xboxes at a loss just to give something back to video game lovers.
Seriously... do your research.
#536
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-12-06
Location: HepCat City
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#537
Off of MSN Auto's--
Yeah, GM was definitely not trying to sell as many as they could. They definitely didn't fall far short of their goals.
I do like the GTO. I know I've already said that, but it's a nice car. But before people go around talking about appealing, maybe they should not be driving a car that is, at the most, an underground sensation. A lot of people's reactions I've seen in reference to the GTO's notoriety is how similar it looks to a Grand Prix.....and that's about it. This same concept seems to be reinforced by it's poor sales.
Of course, a lot of people make ignorant comments about things when they are biased.
"Modern GTO Disappoints
Go figure. Even the storied muscle car name of "Pontiac GTO" can't draw lots of Americans to a sizable, rear-wheel-drive V8-powered coupe.
Indeed, the best year for the modern reincarnation of the GTO was in calendar 2004, but with only 13,569 GTO sales in the U.S. The modern GTO is actually a U.S. version of the Holden Monaro coupe made in an Australian factory by Pontiac's parent company, General Motors Corp. The GTO never hit the company's 18,000 annual U.S. sales target.
With no sign that the U.S. coupe market would revive, and with GTO sales going downhill, as well as new federal regulations kicking in that would add costs to the car, GM cancelled the GTO after three model years. The last cars likely will be found through summer on dealer lots.
Intriguingly, Ford's muscle car, the Mustang, continues to sell like hotcakes. But then, the Mustang has a base V6 and a starting MSRP of just under $20,000. The GTO has a gas-gulping, 400-horsepower V8 and a starting MSRP of $31,290 for the 2006 model. "
Go figure. Even the storied muscle car name of "Pontiac GTO" can't draw lots of Americans to a sizable, rear-wheel-drive V8-powered coupe.
Indeed, the best year for the modern reincarnation of the GTO was in calendar 2004, but with only 13,569 GTO sales in the U.S. The modern GTO is actually a U.S. version of the Holden Monaro coupe made in an Australian factory by Pontiac's parent company, General Motors Corp. The GTO never hit the company's 18,000 annual U.S. sales target.
With no sign that the U.S. coupe market would revive, and with GTO sales going downhill, as well as new federal regulations kicking in that would add costs to the car, GM cancelled the GTO after three model years. The last cars likely will be found through summer on dealer lots.
Intriguingly, Ford's muscle car, the Mustang, continues to sell like hotcakes. But then, the Mustang has a base V6 and a starting MSRP of just under $20,000. The GTO has a gas-gulping, 400-horsepower V8 and a starting MSRP of $31,290 for the 2006 model. "
Yeah, GM was definitely not trying to sell as many as they could. They definitely didn't fall far short of their goals.
I do like the GTO. I know I've already said that, but it's a nice car. But before people go around talking about appealing, maybe they should not be driving a car that is, at the most, an underground sensation. A lot of people's reactions I've seen in reference to the GTO's notoriety is how similar it looks to a Grand Prix.....and that's about it. This same concept seems to be reinforced by it's poor sales.
Of course, a lot of people make ignorant comments about things when they are biased.
#538
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-18-07
Location: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and... it looks like a pontiac to me
#539
Senior Member
I find the "Pontiac never really hoped to sell alot of GTO's" angle to be hilarious. Pontiac would have liked nothing more than to sell every one they made and have to make more so they could sell those too. To say otherwise is pretty silly, Pontiac wants to make money, so does GM. With Toyota nipping at GM's heals I don't think they have the luxury of making a car just because they can anymore.
Take the Solstice for example, They made 6,000 for the first year..........once again, not intended to make much profit.
They really couldn't make more than they did. The Holden plant that made them in Elizabethtown only had the capacity to produce what they did. If 100,000 people wanted to buy GTOs you would have just seen dealers asking for markup since the supply was limited, and they trickled onto lots and stayed there.
Also, from a customer standpoint, most expect a great discount on a car when they buy one. GM left the dealers about $1,300 in profit on the GTO, so there was not much wiggle room. Some potential buyers lost interest due to them trying to hold sticker on the car, or UAing the trade to add profit. The GTO was a very expensive car to produce and get to the US, and elsewhere sells for ~$20,000 more (with a few more options that the GTO never had). When you compare it to a car like the Corvette with ~$8,000 in profit, and a cobalt ~$900 in profit, the GTO was definitely overpriced in relation to its production cost (though I know that has no relevance to market value)
#541
Senior Member
I also happen to love the fact how the GTO is 2 years out of production and you can still go buy a new one at the dealer. It's sad but actually funny to me, and I am a GTO owner.
If you think GTO's are hard to sell, try selling a Buick Terraza! LOL! (Anyone who tried knows what I am talking about, the rest of you are going "WTF is a Terraza")
Ah-men!
If you think GTO's are hard to sell, try selling a Buick Terraza! LOL! (Anyone who tried knows what I am talking about, the rest of you are going "WTF is a Terraza")
Ah-men!
Last edited by Psykostevo; 08-30-2007 at 03:01 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#542
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-21-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Take the Solstice for example, They made 6,000 for the first year..........once again, not intended to make much profit.
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
They really couldn't make more than they did. The Holden plant that made them in Elizabethtown only had the capacity to produce what they did. If 100,000 people wanted to buy GTOs you would have just seen dealers asking for markup since the supply was limited, and they trickled onto lots and stayed there.
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Also, from a customer standpoint, most expect a great discount on a car when they buy one. GM left the dealers about $1,300 in profit on the GTO, so there was not much wiggle room. Some potential buyers lost interest due to them trying to hold sticker on the car, or UAing the trade to add profit. The GTO was a very expensive car to produce and get to the US, and elsewhere sells for ~$20,000 more (with a few more options that the GTO never had). When you compare it to a car like the Corvette with ~$8,000 in profit, and a cobalt ~$900 in profit, the GTO was definitely overpriced in relation to its production cost (though I know that has no relevance to market value)
Not in it for profit?
#543
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 10-05-05
Location: Your Rectus
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#544
Senior Member
When you take the $2800 in revenue that the dealer makes as "profit", it then gets split up. ~25% to the salesman ~20% to the manager, and that leaves you with ~$1,500 in PROFIT (not counting other costs associated with the sale like clerks and finance) So if they sell at MSRP there is only a little for the dealer. Most did not sell at MSRP at the dealer.
You CAN speculate "IF" from a benchmarking perspective taking Pontiac as their own example. They made 6,000 solstice and had demand for over a hundred thousand of them, yet they did not increase production for that model year. The following year they doubled production to 12,000 to meet demand. The GTO was planned on 18k in production the first year, and it went into production late. The demand for the car was not strong, as a result they sold about 14,000 of them. The following '05 production year Production costs increased slightly, but MSRP remained basically the same, the '05 was a shortened production year due to the late production of '04 models, and the scheduled production of '06 models. They made less '05's as a result and demand fell when the mustang was released. I think they made about 13,000 '05s.
From my experience selling GTO's, the customers were few and far between, and the price was out of the range of our typical Pontiac Customer. I think had they tried to advertise to vaginas they may have sold more, but I don't think the GTO was ever a womans car like the Mustang has always been.
As for the 6,000 solstice, let's say that they made $2,000 profit on each one that's still only 12,000,000 profit in a billion dollar company. The money that dealers made as markup stayed at the dealership and Pontiac got none of. In general Pontiac couldn't sell a bottle of water to a man dying of thirst, they'd probably even have to ask permission to pour it on him for free.
You CAN speculate "IF" from a benchmarking perspective taking Pontiac as their own example. They made 6,000 solstice and had demand for over a hundred thousand of them, yet they did not increase production for that model year. The following year they doubled production to 12,000 to meet demand. The GTO was planned on 18k in production the first year, and it went into production late. The demand for the car was not strong, as a result they sold about 14,000 of them. The following '05 production year Production costs increased slightly, but MSRP remained basically the same, the '05 was a shortened production year due to the late production of '04 models, and the scheduled production of '06 models. They made less '05's as a result and demand fell when the mustang was released. I think they made about 13,000 '05s.
From my experience selling GTO's, the customers were few and far between, and the price was out of the range of our typical Pontiac Customer. I think had they tried to advertise to vaginas they may have sold more, but I don't think the GTO was ever a womans car like the Mustang has always been.
As for the 6,000 solstice, let's say that they made $2,000 profit on each one that's still only 12,000,000 profit in a billion dollar company. The money that dealers made as markup stayed at the dealership and Pontiac got none of. In general Pontiac couldn't sell a bottle of water to a man dying of thirst, they'd probably even have to ask permission to pour it on him for free.
#546
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-19-05
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL the gto arguements are so flawed...
The solstice plant makes the solstice, sky, and the opel version...total plant output vs capacity will tell the story. Everytime i checked gm was running 3 shifts at the plant to meet demand...they were NOT limiting output. They were cranking em out as fast as they could to get money...Gm doesnt get money from dealer markups or otherwise. Dealer pays invoice to gm...gm refunds any incentives or kickbacks and whats left - cost of car is profit.
Every car produced on paper will make a profit otherwise it wont see production. Though too much production will flood market, increase inventory costs, and overal reduce profitibility
The solstice plant makes the solstice, sky, and the opel version...total plant output vs capacity will tell the story. Everytime i checked gm was running 3 shifts at the plant to meet demand...they were NOT limiting output. They were cranking em out as fast as they could to get money...Gm doesnt get money from dealer markups or otherwise. Dealer pays invoice to gm...gm refunds any incentives or kickbacks and whats left - cost of car is profit.
Every car produced on paper will make a profit otherwise it wont see production. Though too much production will flood market, increase inventory costs, and overal reduce profitibility
#548
Senior Member
#549
http://ultimategto.com/monaro05.htm
Check out that page. Hit control+F and search the word "grand". See how many different times they were compared in appearance.
I'm sure if I search, I can find a bunch more people saying the exact same thing.
They should have kept the Monaro exterior styling IMO.
#550
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-18-07
Location: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://ultimategto.com/monaro05.htm
Check out that page. Hit control+F and search the word "grand". See how many different times they were compared in appearance.
I'm sure if I search, I can find a bunch more people saying the exact same thing.
They should have kept the Monaro exterior styling IMO.
Check out that page. Hit control+F and search the word "grand". See how many different times they were compared in appearance.
I'm sure if I search, I can find a bunch more people saying the exact same thing.
They should have kept the Monaro exterior styling IMO.
i said... the car shares NOTHING with a grand prix except a pontiac badge, i dont care what user comments on a website say.
as i said, it fit right in with pontiac styling, and looks like a modern pontiac.
and offtopic.... finally got a videos with the headers basically same exhaust setup as the dak, except he has an X Pipe and a big cam... i still have stock cam for now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Vj0r7mX-PI