War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Y R all the GTO vs SS Threads Locked ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2008, 02:07 PM
  #1951  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by williamhvx1
NAH MEn, ARE U TELLING ME U SEE a cobalt ss/sc or a ion redline every day?

and the pontiac g5 gt dont have a lsj
yes I do actually. At school, my friend owns one, at meets I see at least 10 or so, driving by I see them all the time, and I also used to own one.

The pontiac was supposed to have a SC version, let me see if I can pull ip the info.

**correction

The G5 was supposed to have a SC version, but it never panned through and was dropped.
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:08 PM
  #1952  
Senior Member
 
Blackout06LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Ft. Eustis, VA
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PhantomSS
lsj is more rare than the lnf.

3 years of producing lsj engines in 2 brands of car... RL and SC

lnf......

camaro, cobalt, solstice, sky, etc etc

lsj will be the bastard child engine.
I am shocked Pontiac didn't put it into their line up. I meant in terms of years its been out. Not in the cars. Their putting a LNF into the Camaro...haha that will turn some heads.
Blackout06LS is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:09 PM
  #1953  
Senior Member
 
PhantomSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-08
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
I am shocked Pontiac didn't put it into their line up. I meant in terms of years its been out. Not in the cars. Their putting a LNF into the Camaro...haha that will turn some heads.
pontiac said screw it...lets put a v6 in it and avoid the whole FI deal.
PhantomSS is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:13 PM
  #1954  
Senior Member
 
williamhvx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-07
Location: south florida =)
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
yes I do actually. At school, my friend owns one, at meets I see at least 10 or so, driving by I see them all the time, and I also used to own one.

The pontiac was supposed to have a SC version, let me see if I can pull ip the info.

**correction

The G5 was supposed to have a SC version, but it never panned through and was dropped.
ok i see one every once in a while..
williamhvx1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 08:42 PM
  #1955  
Senior Member
 
1gmfanatik's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
I am shocked Pontiac didn't put it into their line up. I meant in terms of years its been out. Not in the cars. Their putting a LNF into the Camaro...haha that will turn some heads.
They are NOT putting an LNF in the Camaro. That MAY get some diverse comments though. They are going with a 300hp V6 and the 422hp V8 for the M6, and closer to 405hp for the A6 I believe.
1gmfanatik is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 08:58 PM
  #1956  
Senior Member
 
drew1991sf's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-08
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 7,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chevy will not but lnf in a camaro. Camaro is one of the original muscle cars and that would be a dumb move for them the car already weighs 3700lbs it would be way to slow
drew1991sf is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 09:02 PM
  #1957  
Senior Member
 
williamhvx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-07
Location: south florida =)
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is funny this trhead got almost 2000 post!
williamhvx1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 11:59 PM
  #1958  
Senior Member
 
OneSlowGto's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not funny at all!
OneSlowGto is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 12:22 AM
  #1959  
Senior Member
 
JimzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-17-06
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they put 4cyl in camaros in the 80s
JimzSS is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 08:03 AM
  #1960  
Senior Member
 
williamhvx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-07
Location: south florida =)
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JimzSS
they put 4cyl in camaros in the 80s
wow i dint knew that.. i though ford was the only dumb car company to put 4 cyl on a muscle car..
williamhvx1 is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 10:20 AM
  #1961  
Senior Member
 
PhantomSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-08
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they are seriously talking about an lnf in the new camaro...but beefed up someway. possibly a factory stage kit?
PhantomSS is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:18 AM
  #1962  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PhantomSS
they are seriously talking about an lnf in the new camaro...but beefed up someway. possibly a factory stage kit?
thats kind of gay. It will be wicked heavy compared to the SS/TC and the GXP/RL.
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:34 AM
  #1963  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
So, I'm heavily debating this twin turbo kit for my mustang.

Supposed to be 450rwhp@6,000rpm / 470rwtq@4300rpm.

I would lose a lot of torque compared to my nitrous, but I would have power all the time.
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:36 AM
  #1964  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
So, I'm heavily debating this twin turbo kit for my mustang.

Supposed to be 450rwhp@6,000rpm / 470rwtq@4300rpm.

I would lose a lot of torque compared to my nitrous, but I would have power all the time.
who says u need to lose the N20?
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:38 AM
  #1965  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
who says u need to lose the N20?
Well, I would have to seriously tone it down but I wouldn't want to raise the combustion pressure too much more than the turbos will. I would probably still keep the kit installed, but maybe use it over the intercooler depending on what charge temps look like.
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:40 AM
  #1966  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Well, I would have to seriously tone it down but I wouldn't want to raise the combustion pressure too much more than the turbos will. I would probably still keep the kit installed, but maybe use it over the intercooler depending on what charge temps look like.
get internals and run the N20 with the t-turbo. Im sure all youll need is lower compression pistons to run both, and a good tune of course.
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:52 AM
  #1967  
Senior Member
 
Blackout06LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Ft. Eustis, VA
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is like the 2.3 Turbocharged Mustang.
Blackout06LS is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 12:14 PM
  #1968  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
That is like the 2.3 Turbocharged Mustang.
Pretty funny motor if you ask me, but it seemed to work.
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 12:15 PM
  #1969  
Senior Member
 
Blackout06LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Ft. Eustis, VA
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Pretty funny motor if you ask me, but it seemed to work.
Back when I was looking at project cars...those came across my review. They shocked a lot of people.

But the 4 cyl nonturboed Mustangs... I had one try to jump on me. Thought he was a 2.3T so I just stayed at the light why he took off. He wasn't turboed.
Blackout06LS is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 01:22 PM
  #1970  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
Back when I was looking at project cars...those came across my review. They shocked a lot of people.

But the 4 cyl nonturboed Mustangs... I had one try to jump on me. Thought he was a 2.3T so I just stayed at the light why he took off. He wasn't turboed.
Hey man those 88hp mustangs are tougher than they look. They might be able to make it all the way down the 1/4 mile before the clock stops. LOL!
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 01:27 PM
  #1971  
Senior Member
 
Blackout06LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Ft. Eustis, VA
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Hey man those 88hp mustangs are tougher than they look. They might be able to make it all the way down the 1/4 mile before the clock stops. LOL!
I was in my 2001 Nissan Sentra 1.8L.
Blackout06LS is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 03:10 PM
  #1972  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
I was in my 2001 Nissan Sentra 1.8L.
So it was an even race
Psykostevo is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 03:51 PM
  #1973  
Senior Member
 
HackAbuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Location: Central NY
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
Hey man those 88hp mustangs are tougher than they look. They might be able to make it all the way down the 1/4 mile before the clock stops. LOL!
Mustangs don't need flashy engines. They've got the name to carry them
HackAbuse is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 08:06 PM
  #1974  
Banned
 
RedGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-08
Location: Jonestown
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
So, I'm heavily debating this twin turbo kit for my mustang.

Supposed to be 450rwhp@6,000rpm / 470rwtq@4300rpm.

I would lose a lot of torque compared to my nitrous, but I would have power all the time.
Twin Turbo Mustang 450 WHP or Head Cam GTO 450 WHP LOL.
RedGoat is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 08:37 PM
  #1975  
Senior Member
 
1gmfanatik's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedGoat
Twin Turbo Mustang 450 WHP or Head Cam GTO 450 WHP LOL.
Got a head/cam TBSS putting down that much on a Mustang Dyno. Then again, I AM 1,000lbs heavier. lol
1gmfanatik is offline  


Quick Reply: Y R all the GTO vs SS Threads Locked ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 AM.